Wp(C)/41712/2018 Of M/S. Ponmundam Properties Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
20 Dec 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/41712/2018 Of M/S. Ponmundam Properties Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
20 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/41712/2018 Of M/S. Ponmundam Properties Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
THURSDAY ,THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2018 / 29THAGRAHAYANA, 1940
WP(C).No. 41712 of 2018
PETITIONER/S:
M/S. PONMUNDAM PROPERTIES PVT LTD11/13, PUTHUKUDI, PONMUNDAM P.O, MALAPPURAM -676 106
BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIRSHRI.GOKULRAJ L.SMT. ARYA ANILSMT. NILOOFAR O. NIZAMSREEJITH.R.NAIR
RESPONDENT/S:
1ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE (II), KOZHIKODE-673 001
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS III)ERNAKULAM-682 036
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20.12.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C). No. 41712 of 2018
JUDGMENT
For the assessment years 2014-15, the petitioner filed astatutory appeal along with a stay petition. Pending that appeal, thepetitioner filed an application under Section 220(6) of the Income TaxAct. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax has, however,disposed of the petitioner's Ext.P4 application through the Ext.P5order. That authority required the petitioner to pay 20% as a pre-condition to have the proceedings stayed. Then, the petitionerchallenged the Ext.P5 before the Commissioner of Income Tax,through Ext.P6 application. Seeking its early disposal, the petitionerhas filed this writ petition.
2.In response to the submissions made by the petitioner'scounsel, the learned Standing Counsel informs the Court that theCommissioner of Income Tax will consider the Ext.P6 applicationexpeditiously.
Recording that submission, I dispose of the writ petition.
Sd/-
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
JUDGE
W.P.(C). No. 41712 of 2018
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 30/12/2017
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BEFORE
THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION UNDER SEC. 220(6) FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P5TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DAATED 02.02.2018
EXHIBIT P6
TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 12.2.2018
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.