Wp(C)/4351/2022 Of Shaji Nadesan v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
09 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/4351/2022 Of Shaji Nadesan v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
09 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/4351/2022 Of Shaji Nadesan v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 9 DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 20TH MAGHA, 1943WP(C) NO. 4351 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
SHAJI NADESANAGED 48 YEARS4 C, SHREESHTAM HEERA GRACE, KOWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, INDIA-695003.BY ADVS.ANIL D. NAIRTELMA RAJUEDATHARA VINEETA KRISHNANARAVIND SREEKUMAR
RESPONDENT/S:
1INCOME TAX OFFICERNATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE - NEAC, ROOM NO.402,2ND FLOOR, E-RAMP, NEAR GATE NO.10, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, DELHI-110003.2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, ROOM NO.402, 2NDFLOOR, E-RAMP, NEAR GATE NO.10, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, DELHI-110003.THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FORADMISSION ON 09.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
----------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No. 4351 of 2022
-----------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 9[th] day of February, 2022
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessment relating toassessment year 2018-19, petitioner has preferred an appealbefore the 2[nd] respondent, a copy of which is produced asExt.P2. A petition for stay of proceedings pursuant to theassessment order has also been filed as Ext.P3. Petitionerapprehends coercive proceedings to be effected even before thepetition for stay is considered. Hence this writ petition.
2. Having considered the submissions of the counsel forthe petitioner as well as the respondents, I am of the opinionthat this writ petition itself can be disposed of with a direction.
3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 2[nd]respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 stay petition,
within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copyof this judgment. Till such a decision is taken, all coerciveproceedings against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
Dxy
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 4351/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITSExhibit P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2018-19 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FILEDBEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 20.11.2021.
Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.