Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/438/2022 Of Tamilnad Mercantile Ba...

Wp(C)/438/2022 Of Tamilnad Mercantile Bank v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 07 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/438/2022 Of Tamilnad Mercantile Bank v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
07 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/438/2022 Of Tamilnad Mercantile Bank v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS MONDAY, THE 7 DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 18TH MAGHA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 438 OF 2022 PETITIONER: TAMILNAD MERCANTILE BANK .ERNAKULAM BRANCH, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, PRINCIPAL OFFICER AND POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER R.S RAJAMANIKANDAN, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O. R. SUTHANTHIRAKUMAR , D. NO 64/3334 A, CHITTOOR ROAD, KACHERIPADY, ERNAKULAM KOCHI 682 018BY ADV V.V.SURENDRAN RESPONDENTS: 1THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE 2(2), C.R BUILDING, I.S PRESS ROAD, KOCHI 682 0182THE SUB REGISTRAR,OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, ERNAKULAM 682 0113THE SUB REGISTRAROFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, THRIKKAKARA, ERNAKULAM 682 0284*THE SUB REGISTRAROFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, ERATTUPETTA, ERNAKULAM 682 011* ADDRESS OF R4 IS CORRECTED AS 'THE SUB REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, ERATTUPETTA, KOTTAYAM-686121'AS PER VIDE SEPERATE ORDER DATED 13.01.2022 IN IA 01/2022 IN WP(C) 438/20225V.P RASHEED, M/S. E- ORIENTAL TIMBERS, KAVYA MAHAL, OPP CHAITHANYA MARBLES, N.H BYEPASS, EDAPPALLY 682 024BY ADV CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT(CG-359) OTHER PRESENT: SMT.JASMIN.M.M.-GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON07.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 438 OF 2022 -:2:- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 438 of 2022 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 7[th] day of February, 2022JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that,pursuant to the order dated 13/1/2022, respondents 1 to 4have lifted the attachment endorsed in the certificate andtherefore, nothing further survives in this writ petition. In view of the above submission, this writ petition hasbecome infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. AJM Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMASJUDGE WP(C) NO. 438 OF 2022 -:3:- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 438/2022 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS : Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN FILED W.P(C0 NO. 13530 OF 2017 BEFORE THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 12-2-2019. Exhibit P2A TRUE COPY OF THE ENCUMBRANCE CERTIFICATE NO. 6033/2020 DATED 13-07-2020 ISSUED BY THE TRIPUNITHURA SUB REGISTRAR. Exhibit P3A TRUE COPY OF THE ENCUMBRANCE CERTIFICATE NO. 21781/2021 DATED 13-12-2021 FROM THE 2ND RESPONDENT. Exhibit P4A TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 20-12-2021. RESPONDENT’S EXHIBITS : NIL AJM //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan