Wp(C)/4433/2020 Of Andoorkonam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
17 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/4433/2020 Of Andoorkonam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
17 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/4433/2020 Of Andoorkonam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides,the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
MONDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 28TH MAGHA, 1941
WP(C).No.4433 OF 2020(D)
PETITIONER/S:
ANDOORKONAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.3127REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-IN-CHARGE, KEEZHAVOOR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695584.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.R.HARIKUMARSRI.ARJUN RAGHAVAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-2(1), OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KAWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695003.
WARD-2(1), OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695003.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON17.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction
to dispose of Ext.P3 appeal and Ext.P4 stay petition preferredbefore the second respondent/Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) against the assessment order Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides,the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting onpayment of 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017.Till such time a decision is taken on the appeal, recoveryproceedings pursuant to the assessment order shall be keptin abeyance.
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 DATED 19.12.2019.
EXHIBIT P2
A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 156 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT DATED 19.12.2019.
EXHIBIT P3
A TRUE COPY OF THE ONLINE APPEAL DATED 31.12.2019 ALONG WITH GROUNDS OF APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT, AGAINSTEXT.P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER.
EXHIBIT P4
A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN EXT.P3 APPEAL DATED02.01.2020.
EXHIBIT P5
A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.07.2019 IN W.A.NO.1639 OF 2019.
EXHIBIT P6
A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 25.11.2019 IN WP(C)NO.31787 OF 2019.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.