Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/4437/2020 Of The Poyya Service Co-...

Wp(C)/4437/2020 Of The Poyya Service Co-Operative Society Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)

High Court 17 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/4437/2020 Of The Poyya Service Co-Operative Society Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
17 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/4437/2020 Of The Poyya Service Co-Operative Society Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL MONDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 28TH MAGHA, 1941 WP(C).No.4437 OF 2020(D) PETITIONER/S: THE POYYA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.812POOPPATHY P.O., POOPPATHY, (VIA) MALA, THRISSUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT/S: 1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), AYAKAR BHAVAN, SHAKTAN NAGAR, THRISSUR, PIN-680001. 2THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 2(4), SHAKTAN NAGAR, THRISSUR, PIN-680001. OTHER PRESENT: SRI JOSE JOSEPH SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON17.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a directionto dispose of Ext.P2 appeal preferred before the firstrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against theassessment order Ext.P1. 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the firstrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting onpayment of 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017.Till such time a decision is taken on the appeal, recoveryproceedings pursuant to the assessment order shall be kept inabeyance. sab Sd/- AMIT RAWAL JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 29.11.2019 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE PERIOD 2012-13. EXHIBIT P2COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 31.12.2019 FILEDBY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE PERIOD 2012-13. EXHIBIT P3COPY OF THE ORDER PROCEEDING DATED 05.02.2020 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan