Wp(C)/4505/2020 Of Pallippuram Service Co-Operative Bank v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
17 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/4505/2020 Of Pallippuram Service Co-Operative Bank v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
17 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/4505/2020 Of Pallippuram Service Co-Operative Bank v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
MONDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 28TH MAGHA, 1941
WP(C).No.4505 OF 2020(K)
PETITIONER/S:
PALLIPPURAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANKNO.760, PALLIPURAM, CHERAI, ERNAKULAM-683514 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SMT.ASADEVI MA
BY ADVS.SRI.AJI V.DEVSMT.O.A.NURIYASRI.ALAN PRIYADARSHI DEV
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERTHOPPUMPADY, ERNAKULAM-682005
NON CORP WARD 2(5), INCOME TAX OFFICE, L.G. TOWERS,
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-2KOCHI-682036KOCHI-682036
3THE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES,DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI JOSE JOSEPH SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON17.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a directionto dispose of Exts.P3 and P3(a) appeals and Exts.P4 and P4(a)interim applications preferred before the secondrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against theassessment orders Exts.P1 and P2.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Exts.P3 and P3(a) appeals inaccordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearingto the petitioner, within a period of three months from thedate of receipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting onpayment of 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017.Till such time a decision is taken on the appeal, recoveryproceedings pursuant to the assessment orders shall be keptin abeyance.
sab
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 DATED 12.03.2015BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 DATED 12.03.2015
EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 DATED 30.12.2019BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 DATED 30.12.2019
EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE STATUTORY APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER AGAINST EXT.P1 ORDER DATED 09.04.2015BY THE PETITIONER AGAINST EXT.P1 ORDER DATED 09.04.2015
EXHIBIT P3(A)TRUE COPY OF THE STATUTORY APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER AGAINST EXT.P2 ORDER DATED 15.01.2020BY THE PETITIONER AGAINST EXT.P2 ORDER DATED 15.01.2020
EXHIBIT P4TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED ALONG WITH THE EXT.03 APPEAL DATED 13.04.2015ALONG WITH THE EXT.03 APPEAL DATED 13.04.2015
EXHIBIT P4(A)TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED ALONG WITH THE EXT.03(A) APPEAL DATED 12.02.2020ALONG WITH THE EXT.03(A) APPEAL DATED 12.02.2020
EXHIBIT P5A TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION FROM THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 11.02.2020 DIRECTINGTHE PETITIONER TO REMIT 20% OF THE AMOUNTDEMANDED FOR CONSIDERATION OF EXT.P4 AND P4(A) STAY PETITIONS IN THIS INSTANT CASE1ST RESPONDENT DATED 11.02.2020 DIRECTINGTHE PETITIONER TO REMIT 20% OF THE AMOUNTDEMANDED FOR CONSIDERATION OF EXT.P4 AND P4(A) STAY PETITIONS IN THIS INSTANT CASE
EXHIBIT P6A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 01.07.2019 IN W.A NO.1536/2019HON'BLE COURT DATED 01.07.2019 IN W.A NO.1536/2019
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.