Wp(C)/4518/2020 Of The Thalavoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
18 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/4518/2020 Of The Thalavoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
18 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/4518/2020 Of The Thalavoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
TUESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 29TH MAGHA, 1941
WP(C).No.4518 OF 2020(L)
PETITIONER/S:
THE THALAVOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTDNO.646, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,THALAVOOR P O,KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691332.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.R.HARIKUMARSRI.ARJUN RAGHAVAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD - 4, OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLLAM RANGE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KARBALA JUNCTION, KOLLAM-PIN-691001.2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-PIN-695003.
OTHER PRESENT:
CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM,SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON18.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 18th day of February 2020
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction todispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before the secondrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against theassessment order Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting on paymentof 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017. Till suchtime a decision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedingspursuant to the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance.
shg
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THEYEAR 2017-2018 DATED 27.11.2019.YEAR 2017-2018 DATED 27.11.2019.
EXHIBIT P2A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 156 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT DATED 27.11.2019.SECTION 156 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT DATED 27.11.2019.
EXHIBIT P3A TRUE COPY OF THE ONLINE APPEAL DATED 21.12.2019 ALONG WITH GROUNDS OF APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT, AGAINST EXT P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER.21.12.2019 ALONG WITH GROUNDS OF APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT, AGAINST EXT P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER.
EXHIBIT P4A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN EXT-P3 APPEAL DATED 24.01.2020.THE PETITIONER IN EXT-P3 APPEAL DATED 24.01.2020.
EXHIBIT P5A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.07.2019 IN WA NO. 1639/201919.07.2019 IN WA NO. 1639/2019
EXHIBIT P6A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 25.11.2019 IN WP(C) NO.31787 OF 2019.25.11.2019 IN WP(C) NO.31787 OF 2019.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.