Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/4519/2020 Of The Kazhakuttom Servi...

Wp(C)/4519/2020 Of The Kazhakuttom Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 18 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/4519/2020 Of The Kazhakuttom Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
18 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/4519/2020 Of The Kazhakuttom Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL TUESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 29TH MAGHA, 1941 WP(C).No.4519 OF 2020(L) PETITIONER/S: THE KAZHAKUTTOM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.1457REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KAZHAKUTTOM P. O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT - 695 582. BY ADVS.SRI.T.R.HARIKUMARSRI.ARJUN RAGHAVAN RESPONDENT/S: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 2(1), OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KAWDIAR P. O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 003.2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 003. OTHER PRESENT: CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM,SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON18.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Dated this the 18th day of February 2020 Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction todispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before the secondrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against theassessment order Ext.P1. 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting on paymentof 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017. Till suchtime a decision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedingspursuant to the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance. shg SD/- AMIT RAWAL APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan