Wp(C)/4603/2020 Of Keralam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
18 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/4603/2020 Of Keralam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
18 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18, 2012-13
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/4603/2020 Of Keralam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
TUESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 29TH MAGHA, 1941
WP(C).No.4603 OF 2020(A)
PETITIONER:
KERALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO. 600 THANISSERY, P.O. KARALAM THRISSUR 680 701, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.JOJOSMT.SWATHY S.
RESPONDENTS:
1INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 2 (2), AYANKAR BHAVAN, SHAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR 680 001.
2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THRISSUR.
BY SRI JOSE JOSEPH, STANDING COUNSEL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON18.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.4603 OF 2020(A)
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a
direction to dispose of Exts.P3 and P7 appeals preferredbefore the second respondent/Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) against the assessment orders Exts.P1 and P5.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides,the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to thesecond respondent to take a decision on Exts.P3 and P7appeals in accordance with law, after affording anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period ofthree months from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment without insisting on payment of 20% of the taxdemanded, as per circular of 2017. Till such time adecision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedingspursuant to the assessment orders shall be kept inabeyance.
Skk//22022020
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL, JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FORAY 2017-18 DATED 27.11.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2
A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S 156 DATED 27.1.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRSTRESPONDENT.156 DATED 27.1.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRSTRESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2017-18 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 03.01.2020.18 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 03.01.2020.
EXHIBIT P4
A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE1ST RESPONDENT DATED 14.01.2020 FOR 20%OF TAX.1ST RESPONDENT DATED 14.01.2020 FOR 20%OF TAX.
EXHIBIT P5A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FORAY 2012-13 DATED 27.11.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.AY 2012-13 DATED 27.11.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P6A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S 156 DATED 27.11.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.156 DATED 27.11.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P7A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2012-13 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 01.01.2020.13 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 01.01.2020.
EXHIBIT P8A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE1ST RESPONDENT DATED 16.01.2020 FOR 20%OF TAX.1ST RESPONDENT DATED 16.01.2020 FOR 20%OF TAX.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:NIL
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.