Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/4629/2020 Of Mekkadampu Service Co...

Wp(C)/4629/2020 Of Mekkadampu Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 18 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/4629/2020 Of Mekkadampu Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
18 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/4629/2020 Of Mekkadampu Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on bothsides, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction tothe second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3appeal in accordance with law, after affording anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period ofthree months from the date of receipt of...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL TUESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 29TH MAGHA, 1941WP(C).No.4629 OF 2020(C) PETITIONER: MEKKADAMPU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTDNO.4073, MEKKADAMPU.P.O, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM-682316, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.JOJOSMT.SWATHY S. RESPONDENTS: 1INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD-1 & TPS, THODUPUZHA, THODUPUZHA-685584. 2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-2,OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL REVENUE TOWER,KOCHI-682002. BY SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, STANDING COUNSEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON18.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court seeking adirection to dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before the second respondent/Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) against the assessment order Ext.P1. 2.Having heard the learned counsel on bothsides, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction tothe second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3appeal in accordance with law, after affording anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period ofthree months from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment without insisting on payment of 20% of the taxdemanded, as per circular of 2017. Till such time adecision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedingspursuant to the assessment order shall be kept inabeyance. Having heard the learned counsel on both Skk//22022020 Sd/- AMIT RAWAL, JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR AY 2017-18 DATED 20.12.2019 ISSUEDBY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S 156 DATED 20.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2017-18 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 18.01.2020. EXHIBIT P4A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 12.02.2010 FOR 20% OF TAX. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan