Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/4704/2005 Of K.anil Kumar v. Chief...

Wp(C)/4704/2005 Of K.anil Kumar v. Chief Commissioener Of Incometax

High Court 02 Mar 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/4704/2005 Of K.anil Kumar v. Chief Commissioener Of Incometax
Date of order
02 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/4704/2005 Of K.anil Kumar v. Chief Commissioener Of Incometax, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. vku/- Sd/- K.Vinod Chandran, Judge. - true copy -

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH 2012/12TH PHALGUNA 1933 W.P.(C).No.4704 of 2005 (I) ---------------------------------------------- PETITIONERS:- ---------------------- 1. K.ANILKUMAR, S/O.LATE N.KARUNAKARAN, HOTEL AMBALAKKARA, THEVALLY, KOLLAM. 2. K.BYJU, S/O.LATE N.KARUNAKARAN, HOTEL AMBALAKKARA, THEVALLY, KOLLAM. BY ADVS.SRI.B.MOHANLAL SMT.MEREENA JOSEPH RESPONDENTS:- ------------------------- 1. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-3. 2. THE TAX RECOVERY OFFICER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, USHUS COMPLEX, VADAYATTUKOTTA, KOLLAM. KOLLAM. 3. THE SUB REGISTRAR, NEAR COLLECTORATE, KOLLAM. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KOLLAM WEST VILLAGE, KOLLAM. * ADDL.5TH RESPONDENT IMPLEADED - -------------------------------------------------------- ADDL.R5. V.THANKAMMA, SREE VILASOM, EZHUKONE, KOLLAM. (ADDITIONAL 5TH RESPONDENT IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN THE WRIT PETITION, DATED 18.02.2005) R1 & R2 BY STANDING COUNSEL FOR GOI (TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH . R3 & R4 BY SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER (TAXES) SRI.S.SUDHISH KUMAR. R5 BY ADV.SRI.REJI MATHEW KAVALAYIL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR FINAL HEARINGON 02-03-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:- K. Vinod Chandran, J. -------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.4704 of 2005-I --------------------------------------- Dated this, the 2[nd] day of March, 2012 JUDGMENT The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. vku/- Sd/- K.Vinod Chandran, Judge. - true copy -
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan