Wp(C)/4704/2005 Of K.anil Kumar v. Chief Commissioener Of Incometax
High Court
02 Mar 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/4704/2005 Of K.anil Kumar v. Chief Commissioener Of Incometax
Date of order
02 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/4704/2005 Of K.anil Kumar v. Chief Commissioener Of Incometax, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. vku/- Sd/- K.Vinod Chandran, Judge. - true copy -
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:-
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH 2012/12TH PHALGUNA 1933
W.P.(C).No.4704 of 2005 (I)
----------------------------------------------
PETITIONERS:-
----------------------
1. K.ANILKUMAR,
S/O.LATE N.KARUNAKARAN,
HOTEL AMBALAKKARA, THEVALLY, KOLLAM.
2. K.BYJU,
S/O.LATE N.KARUNAKARAN,
HOTEL AMBALAKKARA, THEVALLY, KOLLAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.B.MOHANLAL
SMT.MEREENA JOSEPH
RESPONDENTS:-
-------------------------
1. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-3.
2. THE TAX RECOVERY OFFICER,
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, USHUS COMPLEX, VADAYATTUKOTTA, KOLLAM. KOLLAM.
3. THE SUB REGISTRAR,
NEAR COLLECTORATE, KOLLAM.
4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
KOLLAM WEST VILLAGE, KOLLAM.
* ADDL.5TH RESPONDENT IMPLEADED -
--------------------------------------------------------
ADDL.R5. V.THANKAMMA,
SREE VILASOM, EZHUKONE, KOLLAM.
(ADDITIONAL 5TH RESPONDENT IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN THE WRIT PETITION, DATED 18.02.2005)
R1 & R2 BY STANDING COUNSEL FOR GOI (TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH . R3 & R4 BY SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER (TAXES) SRI.S.SUDHISH KUMAR. R5 BY ADV.SRI.REJI MATHEW KAVALAYIL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR FINAL HEARINGON 02-03-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
K. Vinod Chandran, J.
--------------------------------------
W.P.(C).No.4704 of 2005-I
---------------------------------------
Dated this, the 2[nd] day of March, 2012
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits
that the writ petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
vku/-
Sd/- K.Vinod Chandran, Judge.
- true copy -
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.