Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/4747/2020 Of Nadakkal Service Co-O...

Wp(C)/4747/2020 Of Nadakkal Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 19 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/4747/2020 Of Nadakkal Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
19 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/4747/2020 Of Nadakkal Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 30TH MAGHA, 1941 WP(C).No.4747 OF 2020(P) PETITIONER/S: NADAKKAL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.KALLUVATHUKKAL.P.O, KOLLAM-691578, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.JOJOSMT.SWATHY S. RESPONDENT/S: 1INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD-4,KOLLAM,AYAKAR BHAVAN, KOLLAM-691001. 2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-1,OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS),TRIVANDRUM-695003. R1-2 BY SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT OTHER PRESENT: SRI JOSE JOSEPH SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON19.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a directionto dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before the secondrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against theassessment order Ext.P1. 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting on paymentof 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017. Till suchtime a decision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedingspursuant to the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance. Sd/- AMIT RAWAL JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan