Wp(C)/4747/2020 Of Nadakkal Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
19 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/4747/2020 Of Nadakkal Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
19 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/4747/2020 Of Nadakkal Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 30TH MAGHA, 1941
WP(C).No.4747 OF 2020(P)
PETITIONER/S:
NADAKKAL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.KALLUVATHUKKAL.P.O, KOLLAM-691578, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.JOJOSMT.SWATHY S.
RESPONDENT/S:
1INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD-4,KOLLAM,AYAKAR BHAVAN, KOLLAM-691001.
2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-1,OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS),TRIVANDRUM-695003.
R1-2 BY SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI JOSE JOSEPH SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON19.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a directionto dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before the secondrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against theassessment order Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting on paymentof 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017. Till suchtime a decision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedingspursuant to the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance.
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.