Wp(C)/4809/2020 Of Palluruthy Mandalam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
19 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/4809/2020 Of Palluruthy Mandalam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
19 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
2011-12, 2012-13, 2015-16
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/4809/2020 Of Palluruthy Mandalam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 30TH MAGHA, 1941
WP(C).No.4809 OF 2020(A)
PETITIONER/S:
PALLURUTHY MANDALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO. 65PALLURUTHY P.O., KOCHI-682006, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.JOJOSMT.SWATHY S.
RESPONDENT/S:
1INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD-2(5), INCOME TAX OFFICE, L.G.TOWERS, THOPPUMPADY, ERNAKULAM-682005.2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-2,OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL REVENUE TOWER, KOCHI-682018.
R1-2 BY SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON19.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a directionto dispose of Exts.P3, P6 and P9 appeals preferred before thesecond respondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)against the assessment orders Exts.P1, P4 and P7.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Exts.P3, P6 and P9 appealsin accordance with law, after affording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner, within a period of three monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment withoutinsisting on payment of 20% of the tax demanded, as percircular of 2017. Till such time a decision is taken on theappeal, recovery proceedings pursuant to the assessmentorders shall be kept in abeyance.
sab
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER AY 2011-12 DATED 20.03.2015 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.2011-12 DATED 20.03.2015 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S 156 DATED 20.03.2015 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.DATED 20.03.2015 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2012-13
BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 07.04.2015.07.04.2015.
EXHIBIT P4A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR AY 2015-16 DATED 28.12.2017 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.AY 2015-16 DATED 28.12.2017 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P5A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE FOR AN AMOUNT OF RS.24,21,38,090/-U/S 156 DATED 28.12.2017 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.AMOUNT OF RS.24,21,38,090/-U/S 156 DATED 28.12.2017 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P6A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2015-16 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 25.1.2018.BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 25.1.2018.
EXHIBIT P7A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR AY 2017-18 DATED 30.12.2019 ISSUED BY THEFIRST RESPONDENT.AY 2017-18 DATED 30.12.2019 ISSUED BY THEFIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P8A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE FOR AN AMOUNT OF RS.4,39,45,8603/-U/S 156 DATED 30.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.AMOUNT OF RS.4,39,45,8603/-U/S 156 DATED 30.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P9A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2017-18 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 28.01.2020.BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 28.01.2020.
EXHIBIT P10A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DEMAND DATED13.02.2019 FOR AY 2017-18 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.13.02.2019 FOR AY 2017-18 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P11A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 11.02.2019 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.11.02.2019 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.