Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/4827/2005 Of Mary Issac v. Agricul...

Wp(C)/4827/2005 Of Mary Issac v. Agricultural Income Tax Officer,Kottayam

High Court 13 Jun 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/4827/2005 Of Mary Issac v. Agricultural Income Tax Officer,Kottayam
Date of order
13 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/4827/2005 Of Mary Issac v. Agricultural Income Tax Officer,Kottayam, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 13TH JUNE 2008 / 23RD JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 4827 of 2005(Y) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ MARY ISSAC, PANAMPUNNAYIL, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOHN RAMESH K.I.JOHN RESPONDENTS: ------------- AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX OFFICER, KOTTAYAM. BY G.P. SRI. TEKCHAND THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT IN OP 1530 OF 2001 DATED 15.1.2001 EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF REVISED ORDER DATED 28.7.2001 EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 17.4.2002 EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REFUND VOUCHER NO. 2603 DATED 17.6.2002 EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REFUND VOUCHER NO. 2602 DATED 17.6.2002 EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 14.12.2002 EXT.P7 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 15.9.2003 EXT.P8 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 6.10.2003 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE. C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.C. NO.4827 OF 2005 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT W.P. is filed for direction to the Officer to grant interest forbelated refund of excess tax paid. W.P. is accordingly disposed ofdirecting the Officer to compute the interest payable to the petitionerunder Section 68(4) of the AIT Act and grant eligible interest within aperiod of two months from the date of production of a copy of thisjudgment by the petitioner. Petitioner can compute entitlement ofinterest and give a statement to the Officer for him to consider the sameat the time of granting interest. If file is transferred to any otherofficer, such Officer will treat the above direction as one issued to him. kk (C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan