Wp(C)/4863/2020 Of The Anchal Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
20 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/4863/2020 Of The Anchal Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
20 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/4863/2020 Of The Anchal Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides,the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal inaccordance with law, after affording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner, within a period of three monthsfrom the date of receipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 1ST PHALGUNA, 1941WP(C).No.4863 OF 2020(G)
PETITIONER/S:
THE ANCHAL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.2574,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRTARY, ANCHAL P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691 306.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.R.HARIKUMARSRI.ARJUN RAGHAVAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 1 AND TPS, OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX, KOLLAM RANGE, AAYAKAR BAHVAN, KARBALA JUNCTION, KOLLAM, PIN-691 001.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 003.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM,SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON20.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a directionto dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before the secondrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) againstthe assessment order Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides,the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal inaccordance with law, after affording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner, within a period of three monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment withoutinsisting on payment of 20% of the tax demanded, as percircular of 2017. Till such time a decision is taken on theappeal, recovery proceedings pursuant to the assessmentorder shall be kept in abeyance.
sab
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2017-2018 DATED 20.11.2019.
EXHIBIT P2
A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 156 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT DATED 20.11.2019.
EXHIBIT P3
A TRUE COPY OF THE ONLINE APPEAL DATED 18.12.2019 ALONG WITH GROUNDS OF APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AGAINST EXT.P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER.
EXHIBIT P4
A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED ON 14.01.2020 IN EXT.P3 APPEAL.
EXHIBIT P5
A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.07.2019 IN WA NO.1639 OF 2019.
EXHIBIT P6
A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 25.11.2019 IN WPC NO.31787 OF 2019.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.