Wp(C)/4919/2020 Of Poovathumkadavu Farmers Service Co-Op Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
20 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/4919/2020 Of Poovathumkadavu Farmers Service Co-Op Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
20 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
2012-13, 2017-18
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/4919/2020 Of Poovathumkadavu Farmers Service Co-Op Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Exts.P3 and P7 appeals inaccordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearingto the petitioner, within a period of three months from thedate of r...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 1ST PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.4919 OF 2020(L)
PETITIONER/S:
POOVATHUMKADAVU FARMERS SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD.NO.4686, PANAGAD P.O., THRISSUR - 680 665 REPRESENTEDBY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.JOJOSMT.SWATHY S.
RESPONDENT/S:
1INCOME TAX OFFICER
WARD-2(4), THRISSUR, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, NEAR SHAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR THRISSUR - 680 001
2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-2OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THRISSUR - 680 001
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI JOSE JOSEPH,SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON20.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 20th day of February 2020
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction
to dispose of Exts.P3 and P7 appeals before the secondrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) againstthe assessment orders Exts.P1 and P5.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Exts.P3 and P7 appeals inaccordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearingto the petitioner, within a period of three months from thedate of receipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting onpayment of 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017.Till such time a decision is taken on the appeal, recoveryproceedings pursuant to the assessment orders shall be keptin abeyance.
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER AY 2012-13 DATED 13.11.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P2
A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S156 DATED 13.11.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P3
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2012-13 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 05.12.2019
EXHIBIT P4
A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 14.01.2020 FOR 20% OF TAX
EXHIBIT P5
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER AY 2017-18 DATED 26.11.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P6
A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S 156 DATED 26.11.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P7
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2017-18 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 24.12.2019
EXHIBIT P8
A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE U/S 221(1) ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 14.01.2020
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.