Wp(C)/5035/2020 Of Maranagttupilly Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
20 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/5035/2020 Of Maranagttupilly Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
20 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/5035/2020 Of Maranagttupilly Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 1ST PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.5035 OF 2020(D)
PETITIONER/S:
MARANAGTTUPILLY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.3556MARANAGTTUPILLY P.O KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-IN-CHARGE.
BY ADVS.SRI.SUNIL CYRIACSMT.DONA AUGUSTINE
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 3, OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX KOTTAYAM RANGE, INCOME TAX OFFICE, PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING, SHASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM-686 001.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), INCOME TAX OFFICE, PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING, SHASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM-686 001.
SC, JOSE JOSEPH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON20.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction
to dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before the secondrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against theassessment order Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting onpayment of 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017.Till such time a decision is taken on the appeal, recoveryproceedings pursuant to the assessment order shall be kept inabeyance.
sab
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 23.12.20219 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DEMAND DATED 23.12.2019 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P3
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 23.1.2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P4
TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 4.2.2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P5
TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 11.2.2020IN WPC NO 3838 OF 2020 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.