Wp(C)/5037/2020 Of Ettumanoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
20 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/5037/2020 Of Ettumanoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
20 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/5037/2020 Of Ettumanoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the thirdrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 1ST PHALGUNA, 1941WP(C).No.5037 OF 2020(D)
PETITIONER/S:
ETTUMANOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,PEROOR ROAD, ETTUMANOOR, KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITSSECRETARY IN CHARGE THUSHARA JOSEPH.
BY ADV. SRI.S.ARUN RAJ
RESPONDENT/S:
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON20.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a directionto dispose of Ext.P2 appeal preferred before the thirdrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against theassessment order Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the thirdrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting onpayment of 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017.Till such time a decision is taken on the appeal, recoveryproceedings pursuant to the assessment order shall be kept inabeyance.
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED
29/12/2019 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THE ACT FOR THE AY 2017-18.
EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2017-18.
EXHIBIT P3
TRUE COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION DATED 10/02/2020 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2017-18.
EXHIBIT P4
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11/02/2020 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER FOR THE AY 2017-18.
EXHIBIT P5TRUE COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2017-18.
EXHIBIT P6
TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 23/10/2019 PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WPC NO.28170/2019 IN SIMILAR CASE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.