Wp(C)/5070/2020 Of Kundayam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
24 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/5070/2020 Of Kundayam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
24 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/5070/2020 Of Kundayam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 5TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.5070 OF 2020(G)
PETITIONER:
KUNDAYAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.3259,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KUNDAYAM P.O., PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-689 695.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.R.HARIKUMARSRI.ARJUN RAGHAVAN
RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 4, OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLLAM RANGE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KARBALA JUNCTION, KOLLAM, PIN-691 001.2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS),AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 003.
CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON24.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 24th day of February 2020
The petitioner, a co-operative society filed an appeal as againstthe assessment order under the Income Tax Act before the 2ndrespondent. The assessing authority insisted payment of 20% of thedisputed tax to grant stay against recovery, pending appeal.
In the light of the various judgments of this Court, the appellateauthority-2nd respondent is directed to dispose the appeal within aperiod of two months after issuing notice to the petitioner. Till then,the recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. Orderedaccordingly.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THEYEAR 2017-2018 DATED 30.11.2019.
EXHIBIT P2
A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 156 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT DATED 30.11.2019.
EXHIBIT P3
A TRUE COPY OF THE ONLINE APPEAL DATED 06.12.2019 ALONG WITH GROUNDS OF APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AGAINST EXT.P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER.
EXHIBIT P4
A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN EXT.P3 APPEAL DATED 24.01.2020.
EXHIBIT P5
A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.07.2019 IN WA NO.1639 OF 2019.
EXHIBIT P6
A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 25.11.2019 IN WPC NO.31787 OF 2019.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:-NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.