Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/5070/2020 Of Kundayam Service Co-O...

Wp(C)/5070/2020 Of Kundayam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 24 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/5070/2020 Of Kundayam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
24 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/5070/2020 Of Kundayam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 5TH PHALGUNA, 1941 WP(C).No.5070 OF 2020(G) PETITIONER: KUNDAYAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.3259,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KUNDAYAM P.O., PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-689 695. BY ADVS.SRI.T.R.HARIKUMARSRI.ARJUN RAGHAVAN RESPONDENTS: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 4, OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLLAM RANGE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KARBALA JUNCTION, KOLLAM, PIN-691 001.2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS),AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 003. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON24.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Dated this the 24th day of February 2020 The petitioner, a co-operative society filed an appeal as againstthe assessment order under the Income Tax Act before the 2ndrespondent. The assessing authority insisted payment of 20% of thedisputed tax to grant stay against recovery, pending appeal. In the light of the various judgments of this Court, the appellateauthority-2nd respondent is directed to dispose the appeal within aperiod of two months after issuing notice to the petitioner. Till then,the recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. Orderedaccordingly. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THEYEAR 2017-2018 DATED 30.11.2019. EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 156 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT DATED 30.11.2019. EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE ONLINE APPEAL DATED 06.12.2019 ALONG WITH GROUNDS OF APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AGAINST EXT.P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER. EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN EXT.P3 APPEAL DATED 24.01.2020. EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.07.2019 IN WA NO.1639 OF 2019. EXHIBIT P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 25.11.2019 IN WPC NO.31787 OF 2019. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:-NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan