Wp(C)/5121/2013 Of M/S Eastern Motors v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
22 Feb 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/5121/2013 Of M/S Eastern Motors v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
22 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/5121/2013 Of M/S Eastern Motors v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/3RD PHALGUNA 1934
WP(C).No. 5121 of 2013 (M) ---------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
-----------------------
M/S EASTERN MOTORS, TOWN HALL JUNCTION,TEMPLE ROAD, HARIPPAD 690 514,REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER C.G. SREEKUMAR.
BY ADV. SRI.S.ARUN RAJ
RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-02-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) NO.5121/2013
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:-
P1:- COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DTD. 28.12.2009 PASSED BY THE ISTRESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2007-08.
P2:- COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENTFOR THE AY 2007-08
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:-
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
tss
ANTONY DOMINIC, J
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W.P.(C).5121/2013
- - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 22[nd] day of February, 2013
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JUDGMENT
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedStanding Counsel appearing for the respondents.
2.Petitioner is an assessee under the Income Tax Act.Assessment for the year 2007-08 was completed as per Ext.P1.Challenging the assessment order, petitioner filed Ext.P2 appealwithout any application for stay. Appeal is still not heard and inthe meanwhile, 1[st] respondent is initiating recovery proceedings.It is with this allegation this writ petition is filed.
In view of the pendency of Ext.P2 appeal, I dispose of thiswrit petition directing that the 2[nd] respondent shall pass ordersthereon, as expeditiously as possible. It is also directed thatsubject to the petitioner remitting 1/3[rd] of the tax due under Ext.P1within four weeks from today, recovery of the balance amount duewill stand stayed, pending disposal of the appeal.
mrcs
ANTONY DOMINIC,Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.