Wp(C)/5200/2020 Of Kulathupuzha Service Co-Operative Babk Ltd.1867 v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
24 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/5200/2020 Of Kulathupuzha Service Co-Operative Babk Ltd.1867 v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
24 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/5200/2020 Of Kulathupuzha Service Co-Operative Babk Ltd.1867 v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: This writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 5TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.5200 OF 2020(Y)
PETITIONER:
KULATHUPUZHA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BABK LTD.1867REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KULATHUPUZHA P.O. KOLLAM DISTRICT - 691 310.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.R.HARIKUMARSRI.ARJUN RAGHAVAN
RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-2, OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLLAM RANGE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KARBALA JUNCTION, KOLLAM - 691 001.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 003.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC FOR INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON24.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 24[th] day of February 2020
The petitioner filed an appeal under the Income Tax Act. Noting
defect, it was rejected. Thereafter a fresh appeal was filed vide Ext.P7.The petitioner also moved a stay application.
Having considered the pendency of appeal and the stay applicationas above, the appellate authority is directed to dispose the appeal withina period of two months. Till then, recovery proceedings shall be kept inabeyance.
This writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
smp
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
True Copy
smp
P.S to Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.