Wp(C)/5221/2020 Of Kalarickal Sukumaran Vinod v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
24 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/5221/2020 Of Kalarickal Sukumaran Vinod v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
24 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/5221/2020 Of Kalarickal Sukumaran Vinod v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: This writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 5TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.5221 OF 2020(C)
PETITIONER:
KALARICKAL SUKUMARAN VINOD,AGED 45 YEARSS/O. K.P SUKUMARAN RESIDING AT IA, TANZEEL APARTMENT,KUMARANASAN NAGAR, KADAVANTHRA, ERNAKULAM 682 020
BY ADVS.DR.THUSHARA JAMESSRI.M.S.AMAL DHARSAN
RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,CORPORATE CIR 1 (2), OFFICE OF ASSISTANT COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX, ERNAKULAM.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),
ERNAKULAM, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, ERNAKULAM - 682 036.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.JOSEPH JOSE, SC FOR INCOME TAX.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON24.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 24[th] day of February 2020
The petitioner, aggrieved by Ext.P1 assessment order, filed Ext.P2appeal before the 2[nd] respondent. The petitioner also moved Ext.P3 stayapplication.
There shall be a direction to the appellate authority to dispose thestay application within a period of two months. Till then, revenuerecovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance.
This writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
smp
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 30/12/2019EXHIBIT P2TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 29/01/2020EXHIBIT P3TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 30/01/2020
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL.
True Copy
P.S to Judge
smp
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.