Wp(C)/5222/2020 Of Kings Traders v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
24 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/5222/2020 Of Kings Traders v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
24 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/5222/2020 Of Kings Traders v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: This writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 5TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.5222 OF 2020(C)
PETITIONER:
M/S.KINGS TRADERSVIII/564A, KEEZHILLAM P.O., MANNOOR, ERNAKULAM-683 541 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER MR. SHEJI PAUL.
BY ADVS.SRI.A.KUMARSRI.P.J.ANILKUMARSMT.G.MINI(1748)SRI.P.S.SREE PRASADSRI.JOB ABRAHAMSRI.AJAY V.ANAND
RESPONDENTS:
1INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 2, ALUVA-683 101.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-IIPOORNIMA BUILDINGS, MANORAMA JUNCTION, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI-682 036.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC FOR INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON24.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 24[th] day of February 2020
The petitioner, aggrieved by Ext.P1 assessment order, filed Ext.P2appeal before the 2[nd] respondent. The petitioner also moved Ext.P3 stayapplication.
There shall be a direction to the appellate authority to dispose thestay application within a period of two months. Till then, revenuerecovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance.
This writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
smp
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF ASSESSMENT DATED 24.12.2019.
EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED29.1.2020.
EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY DATED29.1.2020.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL.
True Copy
P.S to Judge
smp
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.