Wp(C)/5228/2020 Of Aryanad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
24 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/5228/2020 Of Aryanad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
24 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/5228/2020 Of Aryanad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: This writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 5TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.5228 OF 2020(C)
PETITIONER:
M/S.ARYANAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.593, BANK BUILDING, ARYANAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 542, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY ARUNGHOSH.S.
BY ADV. SRI.S.ARUN RAJ
RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 2(3), AAYAKAR BHAWAN, FIRST FLOOR, KAWDIAR P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003.
2THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,AAYAKAR BHAWAN, KAWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003.
3THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),AAYAKAR BHAWAN, KAWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC FOR INCOME TAX.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON24.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 24[th] day of February 2020
The petitioner, a Co-operative Bank, filed Ext.P2 appeal under the
Income Tax Act before the 3[rd] respondent. The petitioner also moved astay application as per Ext.P3.
Having considered the pendency of the appeal and the stayapplication as above, the appellate authority is directed to dispose theappeal within a period of two months. Till then, recovery proceedingsshall be kept in abeyance.
This writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
smp
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 11.12.2019 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THE ACT FOR THE AY 2017-18.11.12.2019 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THE ACT FOR THE AY 2017-18.
EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2017-18.PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2017-18.
EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION DATED 13.01.2020 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2017-18.13.01.2020 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2017-18.
EXHIBIT P4TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 04.12.2019 PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WPC NO.27295 OF 2019 IN SIMILAR CASE.PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WPC NO.27295 OF 2019 IN SIMILAR CASE.
EXHIBIT P5TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 13.02.2020 PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WPC NO.4167 OF 2020 IN SIMILAR CASE.PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WPC NO.4167 OF 2020 IN SIMILAR CASE.
EXHIBIT P6TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.11.2019 PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WPC NO.31037 OF 2019 IN SIMILAR CASE.PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WPC NO.31037 OF 2019 IN SIMILAR CASE.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL.
True Copy
P.S to Judge
smp
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.