Wp(C)/5330/2020 Of The Thalappalam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)
High Court
25 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/5330/2020 Of The Thalappalam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
25 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/5330/2020 Of The Thalappalam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
TUESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 6TH PHALGUNA, 1941WP(C).No.5330 OF 2020(M)
PETITIONER:
THE THALAPPALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,9/279, PLASSANAL.P.O., KOTTAYAM-686579, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY MR.SUNIL KUMAR.K.R.
BY ADVS.SRI.A.KUMARSRI.P.J.ANILKUMARSMTG.MINI(1748)SRI.P.S.SREE PRASADSRI.AJAY V.ANAND
RESPONDENTS:
1COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS),PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING, SHASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM-686001.2INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 5, INCOME TAX OFFICE, PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING, SHASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM-686001.
BY SRI. JOSE JOSEPH,SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON25.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 25th day of February 2020
Heard Sri. A. Kumar, the learned counsel for the
petitioner and Sri. Jose Joseph, the learned StandingCounsel for respondents.
2.
Petitioner refers to and relies on judgment
dated 01.07.2019 in W.A No.1536 of 2019 and connected
cases to contend that the Division Bench directed disposalof appeal and granted stay of recovery proceedingsduring the pendency of the appeal.
3.
The learned Standing Counsel admits that the
facts of the case are substantially same and similar to thefacts noted by the Division Bench in W.A. No.1536 of 2019,hence can be followed.
Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing the
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/ 1[st] respondent toconsider and dispose of the statutory appeal filed by the
DCS
petitioner herein, at the earliest, taking note of the FullBench decision reported in The Mavilayi Service Co-v. operative Bank Ltd, The Commissioner of Income Tax,Calicut[2019 (2) KHC 287] and to keep in abeyancerecovery proceedings and collection of tax assessed,pending disposal of such appeal.
SD/-
S.V.BHATTI
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 28.12.2019.
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF NOTICE OF DEMAND UNDER SECTION156 DATED 28.12.2019.
EXHIBIT P3
TRUE COPY OF APPEAL FILED IN FORM 35 DATED 4.2.2020.
EXHIBIT P4
TRUE COPY OF STAY APPLICATION DATED 4.2.2020.
EXHIBIT P5
TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH IN WRIT APPEAL 1529/2019 DATED 1.7.2019.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.