Wp(C)/5331/2020 Of Asokan Vasu v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds)
High Court
25 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/5331/2020 Of Asokan Vasu v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds)
Date of order
25 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/5331/2020 Of Asokan Vasu v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
TUESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 6TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.5331 OF 2020(N)
PETITIONER:
ASOKAN VASUPRATHIBAS, NAVAYIKULAM-695 603
BY ADV. SMT.S.K.DEVI
RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)WARD NO. I, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 003
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX APPEALS,AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWADIAR,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003
BY SRI. JOS WINSON FOR SRI. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON25.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 25th day of February 2020
Heard Adv. Sri. S.K.Devi for the petitioner and Sri.
Jose Winson holding for Sri. Christopher Abraham,learned Standing Counsel takes notice for respondents.
2.The petitioner prays for the following
reliefs:-
"i)To issue a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P1order or to issue writ of mandamus to thesecond respondent to pass orders in Ext.P2appeal.order or to issue writ of mandamus to thesecond respondent to pass orders in Ext.P2appeal.
ii)To issue writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P3and P4 notices.
iii)issue a writ of mandamus to the firstrespondent to call back the notices issued toseveral other banks for the dues of theassessment year 2012-13respondent to call back the notices issued toseveral other banks for the dues of theassessment year 2012-13
iv)To issue such other relief as this Hon'bleCourt may deem fit and proper in the factsand circumstances of the case.”Court may deem fit and proper in the factsand circumstances of the case.”
3. The petitioner now limits the prayer to direct
the second respondent to consider and dispose of
Ext.P2 appeal expeditiously.
DCS
4.Adv. Sri. S.K. Devi, appearing for the
petitioner prays for expeditious consideration anddisposal of Ext.P2 by the second respondent.
5.
Sri. Jos Winson, learned Standing Counsel
does not oppose the limited prayer. Hence, the writpetition stands disposed of by this judgment:-
a)
The second respondent considers
and pass orders on Ext.P2 appeal within threemonths from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis judgment.
b)Exts. P3 and P4 garnishee noticesare stayed for three months or till the appeal
Exts. P3 and P4 garnishee notices
is disposed of and copy of order iscommunicated to the petitioner whichever islater.
SD/-
S.V.BHATTI
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR AY 2012-13 DATED 22.03.2016
EXHIBIT P2EXHIBIT P3
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 18.05.2017
TRUE COPY OF GARNISHEE NOTICE DATED 04.02.2020
EXHIBIT P4
TRUE COPY OF GARNISHEE NOTICE DATED 04.02.2020
EXHIBIT P5
TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION DATED 20.02.2020
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.