Wp(C)/5361/2022 Of The Liberty Marine Syndicate Pvt. Ltd v. Asst. Commnr Of Income Tax, Cuttack
High Court
25 Jul 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Wp(C)/5361/2022 Of The Liberty Marine Syndicate Pvt. Ltd v. Asst. Commnr Of Income Tax, Cuttack
Date of order
25 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/5361/2022 Of The Liberty Marine Syndicate Pvt. Ltd v. Asst. Commnr Of Income Tax, Cuttack, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Order No.
03.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.5361 of 2022
The Liberty Marine Syndicate Private ….PetitionerLimited, Jagatsinghpur
Mr. Rudra Prasad Kar, Advocate
-versus- ….Opposite Parties
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Cuttack and another
Mr. Radheshyam Chimanka, Sr. Standing Counsel
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE DR. JUSTICE S. K. PANIGRAHI
ORDER
25.07.2022
1. An additional affidavit has been filed by the Petitioner in Court today enclosing the reasons provided to the Petitioner by the Department for reopening the assessment for the year 2013-14. These reasons show that the reopening of the assessment was on the basis that “the assessee has failed to disclose its income truly and fully for this year as its income of Rs.15,00,000/- from undisclosed source has been passed through accommodation entry, thereby escaping income to the said extent in terms of section 147 of the I.T. Act, 1961 for the said Asst. year.”. The said additional affidavit is taken on record.
2. It is pointed out that by the recent Circular dated 11[th] May, 2022 issued by the ITJ Section, CBDT, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance where the income escaping assessment is less than 50
M. Panda
lakhs, notices cannot be issued in terms of para 7.1 of the said Circular.
3. In that view of the matter, the impugned notice (Annexure-1), and all proceedings consequent thereto, including orders and demands are hereby quashed.
4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(Dr. S. K. Panigrahi)
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.