Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/5546/2022 Of Biswajit Karmakar v....

Wp(C)/5546/2022 Of Biswajit Karmakar v. The Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range I, Odisha

High Court 04 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Wp(C)/5546/2022 Of Biswajit Karmakar v. The Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range I, Odisha
Date of order
04 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/5546/2022 Of Biswajit Karmakar v. The Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range I, Odisha, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: The petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

Order No. 01. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P. (C) No.5546 of 2022 …. Biswajit Karmakar Petitioner Mr. J.M. Pattanaik, Advocate -versus- …. The Principal Chief Commissioner of Opposite Parties Income Tax, Range-I, Odisha and others Mr. R.S. Chimanka, Senior Standing Counsel Along with Mr. A.Kedia, Jr. Standing Counsel CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK ORDER 04.03.2022 1. Notice. Mr. R.S. Chimanka, Senior Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the Opposite Parties (Department). Learned counsel for the Petitioner shall serve extra copy of the writ petition on him today itself. 2. The challenge in the present petition is to the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the ground that it was issued after necessary satisfaction, not of the CIT but of the Joint CIT Range-I, Cuttack. Clearly, therefore, the jurisdictional requirement under Section 148 read with Section 151 of the Act is not satisfied. This decision is consistent with the view already taken by the Court in an order dated 24[th] January, 2022 passed in W.P.(C) No.20919 of 2021 and batch. 3. Consequently, the impugned notice is quashed. The petition is disposed of. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R. K. Pattanaik) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan