W.p.(C)/562/2017 Of Anil Sanghi v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
13 Mar 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
W.p.(C)/562/2017 Of Anil Sanghi v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
13 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In W.p.(C)/562/2017 Of Anil Sanghi v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Without commenting, we would only observe that if any such petition is filed, the same would not be dismissed on the principle of constructive res judicata.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~8
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 562/2017 & CM No.2606/2017 ANIL SANGHI
..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Vasudha Bajaj, Advocate
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER
..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R
% 13.03.2018
Learned counsel for the respondent states that conviction of the petitioner has been set aside by the High Court.
In view of the acquittal order, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition, with liberty to revive the same, if required and necessary.
Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed. CM No.2606/2017 is also dismissed as withdrawn. Learned counsel for the petitioner also states that the petitioner will file a petition for refund of the payment deposited by them.
Without commenting, we would only observe that if any such petition is filed, the same would not be dismissed on the principle of constructive res judicata.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
MARCH 13, 2018/tp
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue