Wp(C)/5646/2018 Of Pradeep Ku.panda v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
17 Mar 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Wp(C)/5646/2018 Of Pradeep Ku.panda v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
17 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/5646/2018 Of Pradeep Ku.panda v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
05. 17.03.20211. Heard Mr. R.P. Kar, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. R. Chimanka, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Opposite Party.
2. A memo has been filed stating that of the total amount payable under the impugned letter dated 20[th] March, 2018, i.e. 20% of the demand, the Petitioner already paid Rs.5 lakhs on 26[th] March, 2018 and the balance Rs.4,66,410/- on 29[th] March, 2018. There is a slight delay in making the above payments.
3. The authority is directed to accept the above payments without prejudice to the rights and contention of the Revenue, by condoning the delay. No further directions are called for.
4. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.
5. An urgent certified copy of this order be issued as per rules. rules.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
(B. P. Routray) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue