Case LawHigh Court › W.p.(C)/5649/2015 Of Vijay Kumar Khanna...

W.p.(C)/5649/2015 Of Vijay Kumar Khanna v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-29, & Anr

High Court 27 May 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
W.p.(C)/5649/2015 Of Vijay Kumar Khanna v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-29, & Anr
Date of order
27 May 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In W.p.(C)/5649/2015 Of Vijay Kumar Khanna v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-29, & Anr, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~94 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(C) 5649/2015 & CM 10171-10172/2015VIJAY KUMAR KHANNA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Salil Aggarwal, Adv. with Mr Prakash Kumar, MrRavi Pratap Mall, Advs. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-29, & ANR ...... Respondents Through: Mr Rohit Madan, Adv.Mr Hashmat Nabi, Adv. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMEDHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVAO R D E R%27.05.2015 This writ petition concerns the notice dated 21.04.2015 issued under section 179(1) of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 to the petitioner. The said notice required the petitioner to show cause asto why proceedings of recovery of the demand mentioned therein should not be initiated againstthe petitioner. The petitioner was required to submit his reply by 30.04.2015. The reply wassubmitted by the petitioner on 30.04.2015. However, till date the said show cause notice has notculminated in any order. Mr Madan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the revenuesubmits that the order shall be passed within four weeks from today. We are also informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to this noticedated 21.04.2015, the TRO is also proceeding against the petitioner. We dispose of this writpetition by directing that the DCIT, Central Circle-29, New Delhi, shall pass an order afterconsidering the response given by the respondent within four weeks. Till such time the TROshall not take any coercive measures. Dasti under the signature of the Court Master. BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan