Wp(C)/5682/2019 Of Navaikulam Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
25 Feb 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/5682/2019 Of Navaikulam Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
25 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
2014-15, 2015-16
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/5682/2019 Of Navaikulam Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDUMONDAY ,THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 6TH PHALGUNA,1940
WP(C).No. 5682 of 2019
PETITIONER/S:
NAVAIKULAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,NO. 964, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY BINDU .S., W/O. ANILKUMAR.N., AGED 47 YEARS, NAVIKULAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA, 695 603.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.JOJOSRI.JACOB CHACKOSRI.MATHEWS JOSEPH
RESPONDENT/S:
4THE ASSISTANT INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH IS PRESS ROD, KACHERIPADY,KOCHI 682 018.
THE ASSISTANT INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
W.P.(C). No. 5682 of 2019
5BRANCH MANAGER,ICICI BANK, KALLAMBALAM BRANCH THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695 605.
6THE BRANCH MANAGER,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 513.
OTHER PRESENT:
SC SRI. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.02.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, an assessee under the Income Tax Act, on therolls of the 2[nd ]respondent, questioned the Exts.P2 and P4 assessmentorders, before the 3[rd] respondent, who rejected it. Later, thepetitioner approached the 4[th] respondent with second appeals. Thepetitioner has also filed stay petitions in the appeals. Ventilating itsgrievance that the authorities are taking coercive steps before theappellate authority could consider the stay petition, the petitionerhas filed this writ petition.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
W.P.(C). No. 5682 of 2019
learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
3.I reckon the petitioner has exercised on time its statutory
remedy of filing appeals. It appears that it has also filed staypetitions. Procedural fairness demands that the authorities may wait,before taking further steps, until the appellate authority decides onthe stay petitions.
Therefore, I dispose of the writ petition directing therespondent authority to defer coercive steps until the 4[th] respondentconsiders the stay petitions. I also hope that the 4[th] respondent willdispose of the stay petitions expeditiously. Because of thisarrangement Exts.P14 and P15 stand suspended.
Sd/-
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
JUDGE
W.P.(C). No. 5682 of 2019
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE IN THIS REGARD ISSUED BY THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 25.11.2015.REGARD ISSUED BY THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 25.11.2015.
EXHIBIT P2A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 29.12.2016 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.DATED 29.12.2016 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED29.12.2016 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.29.12.2016 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 29.12.2017 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.DATED 29.12.2017 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P5
A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED29.12.2016 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.29.12.2016 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P6A TRUE COPY OF THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 18.12.2018 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.DATED 18.12.2018 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P7
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 18.12.2018 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.DATED 18.12.2018 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P8A TRUE COPY OF ORDER GIVING EFFECT TO ORDER U/S 250 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR AY 2014-15 DATED 22.1.2019.ORDER U/S 250 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR AY 2014-15 DATED 22.1.2019.
EXHIBIT P9
A TRUE COPY OF ORDER GIVING EFFECT TO ORDER U/S 250 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR AY 2015-16 DATED 21.1.2019.ORDER U/S 250 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR AY 2015-16 DATED 21.1.2019.
W.P.(C). No. 5682 of 2019
EXHIBIT P10
EXHIBIT P11
EXHIBIT P12
EXHIBIT P13
EXHIBIT P14
EXHIBIT P15
EXHIBIT P16
EXHIBIT P6A TRUE COPY OF THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 18.12.2018 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.DATED 18.12.2018 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P7
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 18.12.2018 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.DATED 18.12.2018 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P8A TRUE COPY OF ORDER GIVING EFFECT TO ORDER U/S 250 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR AY 2014-15 DATED 22.1.2019.ORDER U/S 250 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR AY 2014-15 DATED 22.1.2019.
EXHIBIT P9
A TRUE COPY OF ORDER GIVING EFFECT TO ORDER U/S 250 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR AY 2015-16 DATED 21.1.2019.ORDER U/S 250 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR AY 2015-16 DATED 21.1.2019.
W.P.(C). No. 5682 of 2019
EXHIBIT P10
EXHIBIT P11
EXHIBIT P12
EXHIBIT P13
EXHIBIT P14
EXHIBIT P15
EXHIBIT P16
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2014-15 DATED 20.2.2019 BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
A TRUE COPY OF THE STY PETITION FOR AY2014-15 DATED 20.02.2019 BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2015-6 DATED 20.2.2019 BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FOR AY 2015-16 DATED 20.2.2019 BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE U/S 226 (3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT ISSUED TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 22.2.2019.
A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE U/S 226 (3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT ISSUED TO THE 6TH RESPONDENT BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 22.2.2019.
A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONBLE COURT IN SIMILAR CASE IN WPC NO. 40553/18 DATED 4.1.2019.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.