Case Law › High Court › W.p.(C)/5811/2013 Of Commissioner Of Inc...

W.p.(C)/5811/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S Maruti Suzuki (India) Ltd

High Court 07 Nov 2013 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

07 Nov 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In W.p.(C)/5811/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S Maruti Suzuki (India) Ltd, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

i $-21, 23 & 24 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(C) 5018/2013 & CMNo.11312/2013 (stay)COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX-II C.R. NEW DELHI PetitionerThroughMr. N.P. Sahni, Advocate versus M/S MARUTI SUZUKI (INDIA) LTD Respondent ThroughMr. S. Sukumaran, Advocate. +W.P.(C) 5811/2013 & CMNo.12815/2013 (stay)COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX-IIPetitionerThroughMr. N.P. Sahni, Advocate. versus M/S MITSUBISHICORPORATIONINDIA P.LTDThrough Respondent Mr. S. Sukumaran, Advocate. +W.P.(C) 6069/2013 & CM No.13347/2013 (stay)COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX-IIPetitionerThroughMr. N.P. Sahni, Advocate. versus M/S MARUTI SUZUKI(INDIA)LTDThrough RespondentMr. S. Sukumaran, Advocate. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVAORDER%07.11.2013 These writ petitions have become infructuous as Tribunal has Signature Not Verified i disposed of the appeals of Revenue/assessee on merits.We are notinclined to examine the academic issues in these writ petitions asthere are other writ petitions in which these issues are beingexamined.Thus, the legal questions raised by the petitioner i.e.Revenue will be examined on merits in other cases. The presentwrit petitionsare, however,disposed of asinfi-uctuous. - SANJIVKHANNA,J SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J NOVEMBER 07,2013st

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.