Wp(C)/5898/2020 Of The Manickal Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
28 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/5898/2020 Of The Manickal Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
28 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/5898/2020 Of The Manickal Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/ 2[nd] respondent to WP(C) NO.5898 OF 2020 consider and dispose of the statutory appeal filed by thepetitioner herein at the earliest taking note of the Full Bench decision reported in The Mavilayi Service Co-o...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
WP(C) NO.5898 OF 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.5898 OF 2020(J)
PETITIONER/S:
THE MANICKAL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO. 1910REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIRAPPANCODE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695607.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.R.HARIKUMARSRI.ARJUN RAGHAVAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD-2(3), OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KAWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695003.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695003.
SC CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON28.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO.5898 OF 2020
JUDGMENT
Heard Adv.T.R Harikumar, for the petitioner and
Adv.Christopher Abraham, the Standing Counsel forrespondents.
2.Petitioner refers to and relies on judgment dated01.07.2019 in W.A No.1536 of 2019 and connected cases to
contend that the Division Bench directed disposal of appeal and
granted stay of recovery proceedings during the pendency of theappeal.
3.The learned Standing Counsel admits that the facts of
the case are substantially same and similar to the facts noted bythe Division Bench in W.A. No.1536 of 2019, hence can befollowed.
Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/ 2[nd] respondent to
WP(C) NO.5898 OF 2020
consider and dispose of the statutory appeal filed by thepetitioner herein at the earliest taking note of the Full Bench
decision reported in The Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd,v. [1]The Commissioner of Income Tax, Calicut and to keep inabeyance recovery proceedings and collection of tax assessed,pending disposal of such appeal.
Sd/-
S.V.BHATTI
JUDGE
JS
WP(C) NO.5898 OF 2020
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2017-2018 DATED 13.12.2019.
EXHIBIT P2A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION156 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT DATED 13.12.2019.
EXHIBIT P3
A TRUE COPY OF THE ONLINE APPEAL WITH GROUNDSOF APPEAL ALONG WITH COVERING LETTER DATED 20.12.2019, FILED AGAINST EXT-P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER, BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN EXT-P3 APPEAL DATED 20.12.2019.
EXHIBIT P5A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.07.2019 INW.A.NO.1639 OF 2019.
EXHIBIT P6A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 17.02.2020 INWP(C) NO.4433 OF 2020.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.