Case Law › High Court › Wp(C)/5958/2011 Of Pushpagiri Medical So...

Wp(C)/5958/2011 Of Pushpagiri Medical Society v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 01 Apr 2024 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

01 Apr 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp(C)/5958/2011 Of Pushpagiri Medical Society v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. MONDAY, THE 1 DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 12TH CHAITHRA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 5958 OF 2011 PETITIONER/S: PUSHPAGIRI MEDICAL SOCIETYPUSHPAGIRI MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, THIRUVALLA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARYBY ADVS.SRI.KURIAN GEORGE KANNANTHANAM (SR.)SRI.JIJI THOMASSRI.MATHEW K. SIMONSRI.TONY GEORGE KANNANTHANAM RESPONDENT/S: 1THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXKOWDIAR,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 003 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXKOTTAYAM-01 BY ADV SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON01.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 5958 OF 2011 2 JUDGMENT When this matter is taken up for consideration today,learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writpetition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition isdismissed as infructuous. ajt Sd/-GOPINATH P.JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.