Wp(C)/6035/2018 Of Peroorkada Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
22 Feb 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/6035/2018 Of Peroorkada Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
22 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/6035/2018 Of Peroorkada Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 3RD PHALGUNA, 1939
WP(C).No. 6035 of 2018-------------------------
PETITIONER(S)-------------
PEROORKADA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, NO.T 1412, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY VISWAKUMAR V S/O. K VASUDEVAN PILLAI, AGED 54 YRS, PEROORKADA P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN - 695 005.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.JOJO
SRI.JACOB CHACKO SRI.MATHEWS JOSEPH
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), KOWDIAR, TRIVANDRUM - 695 003
2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-1, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),
TRIVANDRUM - 695 003.
3. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TRIVANDRUM 695 003.
4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TRIVANDRUM 695 003.
R BY SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-02-2018,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
--------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
------------------------
// True copy //
hmh
PA to Judge
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
......................................................
W.P.(C).No.6035 of 2018 ......................................................Dated this the 22[nd] day of February, 2018
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has moved a stay application in anappeal filed before the second respondent . In view of theabove, there shall be a direction to the second respondent todispose of the stay application within a period of two months.Till the disposal of the stay application, all coercive stepspursuant to the impugned assessment order in the appealshall be deferred.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/-A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE,
JUDGE
hmh
// True copy // PA to Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.