Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/6035/2018 Of Peroorkada Service Co...

Wp(C)/6035/2018 Of Peroorkada Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 22 Feb 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/6035/2018 Of Peroorkada Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
22 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/6035/2018 Of Peroorkada Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 3RD PHALGUNA, 1939 WP(C).No. 6035 of 2018------------------------- PETITIONER(S)------------- PEROORKADA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, NO.T 1412, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY VISWAKUMAR V S/O. K VASUDEVAN PILLAI, AGED 54 YRS, PEROORKADA P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN - 695 005. BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.JOJO SRI.JACOB CHACKO SRI.MATHEWS JOSEPH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), KOWDIAR, TRIVANDRUM - 695 003 2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-1, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), TRIVANDRUM - 695 003. 3. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TRIVANDRUM 695 003. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TRIVANDRUM 695 003. R BY SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-02-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------ // True copy // hmh PA to Judge A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J. ...................................................... W.P.(C).No.6035 of 2018 ......................................................Dated this the 22[nd] day of February, 2018 JUDGMENT The petitioner has moved a stay application in anappeal filed before the second respondent . In view of theabove, there shall be a direction to the second respondent todispose of the stay application within a period of two months.Till the disposal of the stay application, all coercive stepspursuant to the impugned assessment order in the appealshall be deferred. The writ petition is disposed of. Sd/-A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE hmh // True copy // PA to Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan