Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/612/2022 Of Aswini Health Care Lim...

Wp(C)/612/2022 Of Aswini Health Care Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 10 Jan 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/612/2022 Of Aswini Health Care Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
10 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/612/2022 Of Aswini Health Care Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above. bka/- Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMASJUDGE APPENDIX OF WP(C) 612/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 28.9.2021 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS MONDAY, THE 10 DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 20TH POUSHA, 1943WP(C) NO. 612 OF 2022 PETITIONER/S: ASWINI HEALTH CARE LIMITEDNO.28/212/2 ASWINI HOSPITAL BLDGS, KARUNAKARAN NAMBIAR ROAD, THRISSUR-680021, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR- VELAYUDHAN A.C.BY ADVS.DIVYA RAVINDRANLINCY GLANCY RESPONDENT/S: 1THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, MUNICIPAL OFFICE ROAD, THRISSUR, KERALA-680001.2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTER, DELHI-110001. OTHER PRESENT: SC. JOSE JOSEPH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FORADMISSION ON 10.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J. -----------------------------------------WP.(C) No. 612 of 2022WP.(C) No. 612 of 2022 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 10[th] day of January, 2022 Dated this the 10[th] day of January, 2022 JUDGMENT Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessmentrelating to assessment year 2018-19,relating to assessment year 2018-19, petitioner has preferred an appeal before the 2[nd] respondent, a copy of which is produced asExt.P2. A petition for stay of proceedingsExt.P2. A petition for stay of proceedings pursuant to the assessment order has also beenfiled as Ext.P3. Petitioner apprehendsfiled as Ext.P3. Petitioner apprehends coercive proceedings to be effected evenbefore the petition for stay is considered.Hence this writ petition.before the petition for stay is considered.Hence this writ petition. 2. Having considered the submissions of thecounsel for the petitioner as well as therespondents, I am of the opinion that thiscounsel for the petitioner as well as therespondents, I am of the opinion that this writ petition itself can be disposed of with adirection. WPC No.612/2022 ..3.. 3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the2[nd] respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 stay petition, within a period of twomonths from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis judgment. Till such a decision is taken, all coercive proceedings against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. bka/- Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMASJUDGE APPENDIX OF WP(C) 612/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 28.9.2021 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED 5.11.2021 E-FILED BEFORE THE 2NDRESPONDENT. Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 29.10.2021, E-FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan