Wp(C)/6248/2020 Of The Vamanapuram Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)
High Court
02 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/6248/2020 Of The Vamanapuram Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)
Date of order
02 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/6248/2020 Of The Vamanapuram Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on bothsides, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction tothe second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appealin accordance with law, after affording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner, within a period of three monthsfrom the date of receipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
MONDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 12TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.6248 OF 2020(E)
PETITIONER:
THE VAMANAPURAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.927REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VAMANAPURAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 606.
BY ADVS.SRI.ARJUN RAGHAVANSRI.ADITHYA RAJEEV
RESPONDENTS:
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON02.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a
direction to dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before thesecond respondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)against the assessment order Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on bothsides, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction tothe second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appealin accordance with law, after affording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner, within a period of three monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this judgmentwithout insisting on payment of 20% of the tax demanded,as per circular of 2017. Till such time a decision is takenon the appeal, recovery proceedings pursuant to theassessment order shall be kept in abeyance.
vv
Sd/-
AMIT RAWALJUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2017-2018 DATED 09.12.2019.
EXHIBIT P2
A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDERSECTION 156 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT DATED 09.12.2019.
EXHIBIT P3
A TRUE COPY OF THE ONLINE APPEAL WITH GROUNDS OF APPEAL AND STATEMENT OF FACTS ALONG WITH COVERING LETTER DATED16.12.2019 FILED AGAINST EXT.P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4
A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILEDBY THE PETITIONER IN EXT.P3 APPEAL DATED 16.12.2019.
EXHIBIT P5
A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.07.2019 IN WA NO.1639 OF 2019.
EXHIBIT P6A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 17.02.2020 IN WPC NO.4433 OF 2020.17.02.2020 IN WPC NO.4433 OF 2020.
//TRUE COPY//PA TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue