Wp(C)/6295/2020 Of Ramapuram North Aiswarya Paradayini Scb Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
03 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/6295/2020 Of Ramapuram North Aiswarya Paradayini Scb Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
03 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/6295/2020 Of Ramapuram North Aiswarya Paradayini Scb Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the firstrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
TUESDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 13TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.6295 OF 2020(J)
PETITIONER/S:
RAMAPURAM NORTH AISWARYA PARADAYINI SCB LTD NO. 1493REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY RAMAPURAM NORTH, KEERIKKADU.P.O, ALAPPUZHA-690508
BY ADVS.SRI.V.G.ARUN (K/795/2004)SMT.V.JAYA RAGISRI.R.HARIKRISHNAN (KAMBISSERIL)SRI.NEERAJ NARAYANSHRI.SARATH SUKUMARAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)BAKER HILLS KOTTAYAM-686002BAKER HILLS KOTTAYAM-686002
2INCOME TAX OFFICERA.N.PURAM, ALAPPUZHA-688011
WARD 3, ALAPPUZHA, ARATTUKULANKARA COMPLEX,
SRI JOSE JOSEPH SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON03.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction todispose of Ext.P3 appeal along with Ext.P5 stay applicationpreferred before the first respondent/Commissioner of IncomeTax (Appeals) against the assessment order Ext.P2.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the firstrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting on paymentof 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017. Till suchtime a decision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedingspursuant to the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance.
Sd/
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE RETURN OF INCOME DATED 28.10.2019 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18
EXHIBIT P2
A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 24.12.2019 ALONG WITH THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 156 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT DATED 24.12.2019 ISSUED FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P3
A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 23.01.2020 FILED FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P4EXHIBIT P5
A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 07.02.2020 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY DATED 10.02.2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.