Wp(C)/6307/2020 Of Kadakkarappally Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
02 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/6307/2020 Of Kadakkarappally Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
02 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/6307/2020 Of Kadakkarappally Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on bothsides, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction tothe second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appealin accordance with law, after affording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner, within a period of three monthsfrom the date of receipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
MONDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 12TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.6307 OF 2020(K)
PETITIONER:
KADAKKARAPPALLY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.1125,KADAKKARAPPALLY.P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA-688529, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.JOJOSMT.SWATHY S.
RESPONDENTS:
1INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-5, ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA-688011.2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-2,OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM-686001.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON02.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking adirection to dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before thesecond respondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)against the assessment order Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on bothsides, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction tothe second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appealin accordance with law, after affording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner, within a period of three monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment withoutinsisting on payment of 20% of the tax demanded, as percircular of 2017. Till such time a decision is taken on theappeal, recovery proceedings pursuant to the assessmentorder shall be kept in abeyance.
Having heard the learned counsel on both
vv
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR AY 2017-18 DATED 20.12.2019 ISSUEDBY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2
A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S.156 DATED 20.12.2019 ISSUED BY THEFIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2017-18 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 9.1.2010.
EXHIBIT P4
A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF DEMAND DATED 3.2.2020 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
//TRUE COPY//PA TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.