Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/6361/2020 Of Ushadevi Purushothama...

Wp(C)/6361/2020 Of Ushadevi Purushothaman v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals-Ii)

High Court 03 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/6361/2020 Of Ushadevi Purushothaman v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals-Ii)
Date of order
03 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/6361/2020 Of Ushadevi Purushothaman v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals-Ii), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL TUESDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 13TH PHALGUNA, 1941 WP(C).No.6361 OF 2020(U) PETITIONER: USHADEVI PURUSHOTHAMANAGED 70 YEARS, W/O. R. VIKKRAMAN, PROPRIETRIX, BELL FOODS PALLICHAL ROAD, THOPPUMPADY, KOCHI-682 005 BY ADV. SRI.ALIAS M.CHERIAN RESPONDENTS: BY SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, STANDING COUNSEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON03.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT This writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging Ext.P1 assessment order dated 26.12.2019. She preferred Ext.P3 appeal dated 14-02-2020 before thefirst respondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals-II) against the assessment order Ext.P1, accompanied byan application for condonation of delay of 16 days. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitsthat there is apprehension of initiation of coercivemeasures writ large in the absence of any decision on theappeal. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, I dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the firstrespondent to decide the appeal dated 14.02.2020preferred against Ext.P1 assessment order noticed aboveand pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law,after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible. The petitioner is granted liberty to press the application for stay as and whennotice of attachment or garnishee or penalty is received. Skk//05032020 Sd/- AMIT RAWAL, JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER NO. ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1023100415(1) DATED 26/12/2019 ALONG WITH INCOME TAX COMPUTATION FORMITBA/AST/S/213/2019-20/102310509(1) DATED 26/12/2019 EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF NOTICE OF DEMAND ITBA/AST/S/156/2019-20/1023100455(1) DATED 256/12/2019 EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF APPEAL DATED 14/02/2020 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENTFILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENTEXHIBIT P3 ATRUE COPY OF FORM NO.35 OF APPEAL DATED 14/02/2020DATED 14/02/2020 EXHIBIT P4TRUE COPY OF OFFICE MEMORANDUM F.NO. 404/72/93-ITCC DATED 31/07/2017 ISSUEDBY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan