Wp(C)/6378/2019 Of Sreevalsam Educational Trust v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
05 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/6378/2019 Of Sreevalsam Educational Trust v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
05 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/6378/2019 Of Sreevalsam Educational Trust v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
TUESDAY ,THE 05TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 14TH PHALGUNA, 1940
WP(C).No. 6378 of 2019
PETITIONER/S:
SREEVALSAM EDUCATIONAL TRUSTTHEKKEMADOM BUILDING, THEKKEMADOM ROADTRICUR-680001, (PRESENTLY AT. SREEVALSAM INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, NADUVATTAM KOLOLAMBA-P.O, EDAPPAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.PIN-679576, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARYSHRI RAJAN ACHUTHAN NAIR.BY ADVS.SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.)SMT.DIVYA RAVINDRANSRI.V.P.NARAYANAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXEXEMPTION CIRCLE, KOCHI-682018.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-III28/243, POORINIMA, NEAR MANORAMA JUNCTION PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI-682036.28/243, POORINIMA, NEAR MANORAMA JUNCTION PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI-682036.
SC SRI. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, a registered dealer under the Income Tax Act on
the rolls of the 1[st] respondent, questioned the Ext.P1 assessment
order, before the 2[nd] respondent. The petitioner has also filed a staypetition in the appeal. Ventilating its grievance that the authoritiesare taking coercive steps before the appellate authority couldconsider the stay petition, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and thelearned Government Pleader.
3.
I reckon the petitioner has exercised on time its statutory
remedy of filing an appeal. It appears that it has also filed a staypetition. Procedural fairness demands that the authorities may wait,before taking further steps, until the appellate authority decides onthe stay petition.
Therefore, I dispose of the writ petition directing therespondent authority to defer coercive steps until the 2[nd] respondentconsiders the stay petition. I also hope that the 2[nd] respondent willdispose of the stay petition expeditiously.
Sd/-
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.