Wp(C)/6418/2020 Of The Thycattussery Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
03 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/6418/2020 Of The Thycattussery Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
03 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/6418/2020 Of The Thycattussery Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on bothsides, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction tothe second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3appeal in accordance with law, after affording anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period ofthree months from the date of receipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
TUESDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 13TH PHALGUNA, 1941WP(C).No.6418 OF 2020(B)
PETITIONER:
THE THYCATTUSSERY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO. 275, THYCATTUSSERY P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA-688 528, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.JOJOSRI.MATHEWS JOSEPH
RESPONDENTS:
1INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 5, ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA-688 011.2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-2,OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM-686 001.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON03.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.6418 OF 2020(B)
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a
direction to dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before thesecond respondent/Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)2, against the assessment order Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on bothsides, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction tothe second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3appeal in accordance with law, after affording anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period ofthree months from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment without insisting on payment of 20% of the taxdemanded, as per circular of 2017. Till such time adecision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedingspursuant to the assessment order shall be kept inabeyance.
Skk//03032020
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL, JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR AY 2017-18 DATED 23.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2
A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE UNDER SECTION 156 DATED 23.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2017-18 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 08.01.2020.
EXHIBIT P4
A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF DEMAND DATED 03.02.2020 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:
NIL
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.