Wp(C)/6594/2020 Of Sreekandamangalam Service Co Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
04 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/6594/2020 Of Sreekandamangalam Service Co Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
04 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-2018, 2017-18
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/6594/2020 Of Sreekandamangalam Service Co Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
WEDNESDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 14TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.6594 OF 2020(Y)
PETITIONER/S:
SREEKANDAMANGALAM SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO. 974MUTTATHIPARAMBU P O, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA-688527, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-IN-CHARGE.
BY ADV. SRI.C.A.JOJO
RESPONDENT/S:
1INCOME TAX OFFICERCIRCLE, ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA-688011.2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM-686001.
SRI JOSE JOSEPH SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON04.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction todispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before the secondrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against theassessment order Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting on paymentof 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017. Till suchtime a decision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedingspursuant to the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance.
Sd/
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR AY-2017-2018 DATED 27.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2
A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S. 156 DATED 27.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2017-18 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 05.1.2020.
EXHIBIT P4
A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF DEMAND DATED 26.02.2020 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.