Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/6687/2012 Of Glen Leven Estate (P)...

Wp(C)/6687/2012 Of Glen Leven Estate (P) Ltd v. The Agricultural Income Tax & Commercial Tax Officer

High Court 16 Mar 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/6687/2012 Of Glen Leven Estate (P) Ltd v. The Agricultural Income Tax & Commercial Tax Officer
Date of order
16 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
2007-08, 2006-07
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/6687/2012 Of Glen Leven Estate (P) Ltd v. The Agricultural Income Tax & Commercial Tax Officer, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH 2012/26TH PHALGUNA 1933 WP(C).No. 6687 of 2012 (I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S):------------------------ GLEN LEVEN ESTATE (P) LTD. VARAYAL, THALAPPUZHA.P.O. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. BY ADV. SRI.A.KRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX & COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, MANANTHAVADY - 670 645. MANANTHAVADY - 670 645. 2. THE APPELLATE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, (APPEALS), KOZHIKODE - 673 006. COMMISSIONER, (APPEALS), KOZHIKODE - 673 006. 3. THE DEPUTY THASILDAR, (REVENUE RECOVERY), TALUK OFFICE, (REVENUE RECOVERY), TALUK OFFICE, MANANTHAVADY - 670 645. 4. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM. REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM. BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SOBHA ANNAMMA EAPEN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-03-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C)NO.6687/2012 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 07/10/2010 FOR THE A.Y. 2007-08.07/10/2010 FOR THE A.Y. 2007-08. P2COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE,DATED 03/12/2010, BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TOTHE PETITIONER.THE PETITIONER. P3COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P4COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICES DATED 28/10/2011 BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT ISSUED UNDER THE KERALA REVENUE RECOVERY ACT, TO THE PETITIONER.ISSUED UNDER THE KERALA REVENUE RECOVERY ACT, TO THE PETITIONER. P5COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 29/12/2008 FOR THE A.Y. 2006-07.29/12/2008 FOR THE A.Y. 2006-07. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.6687 OF 2012(I) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16[th] day of March, 2012 J U D G M E N T Ext.P1 assessment order for the year 2007-08 was underchallenge before the 2[nd] respondent in Ext.P3 appeal. Pleadingsshow that the appeal was heard by the appellate authority on23.2.2012 and that orders in the appeal are intimated. In themeanwhile petitioner states that on the strength of Ext.P4revenue recovery notice they are pressurized to makepayments. Going by the pleadings Ext.P3 appeal filed by thepetitioner has already been heard by the 2[nd] respondent on23.2.2012. 2. Therefore I direct the appellate authority to pass orderson Ext.P3, which shall be done within 4 weeks from today. In themeanwhile further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P4 will be kept inabeyance . :2 : Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along witha copy of the writ petition before the 2[nd] respondent forcompliance. vi/ (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan