Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/677/2020 Of Padmavathy Medical Fou...

Wp(C)/677/2020 Of Padmavathy Medical Foundation v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 03 Feb 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/677/2020 Of Padmavathy Medical Foundation v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
03 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp(C)/677/2020 Of Padmavathy Medical Foundation v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS MONDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 14TH MAGHA, 1941WP(C).No.677 OF 2020(H) PETITIONER: PADMAVATHY MEDICAL FOUNDATIONSASTHAMKOTTA, KOLLAM-690 521, KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER DR.SMITHA SUMITHRAN. RESPONDENT: BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIRSRI.SREEJITH R.NAIRSMT. ARYA ANILSHRI.GOKULRAJ L.SMT.SRI HARINI S.P. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE-I, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOLLAM-691 001. SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON03.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ALEXANDER THOMAS, J. =========================== W.P(C) No.677 of 2020 ===========================Dated this the 03[rd] day of February, 2020 JUDGMENT The prayers in this Writ Petition (Civil) are as follows: “a.Call for the records leading to issuance of Ext.P12 and quash thesame by issuing a writ of certiorari;same by issuing a writ of certiorari; b. Pending hearing and final disposal of the Writ Petition, thisHon'ble Court be pleased to grant stay of recovery of tax dueunder Exhibit P12;Hon'ble Court be pleased to grant stay of recovery of tax dueunder Exhibit P12; c. To issue such other and further reliefs as this Hon'ble Court maydeem fit and proper in the interest of justice.”deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.” 2.Sri.Anil D.Nair, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit on the basis of instructions of his party thatleave may be granted to the petitioner to withdraw this Writ Petition(Civil) with liberty to the petitioner to file statutory appeal to challenge the impugned Ext.P-12 order. Liberty is accorded to the petitioner towork out their statutory remedies in the manner known to law. With the said liberty, the above Writ Petition (Civil) will standdismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- ALEXANDER THOMAS JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan