Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/6789/2018 Of M/S. Kalyan Sarees v....

Wp(C)/6789/2018 Of M/S. Kalyan Sarees v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)

High Court 09 Apr 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/6789/2018 Of M/S. Kalyan Sarees v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
09 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp(C)/6789/2018 Of M/S. Kalyan Sarees v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BADAR FRIDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 19TH CHAITHRA, 1943 WP(C).No.6789 OF 2018(W) PETITIONER: M/S. KALYAN SAREES,FORT VIEW, ATTAKKULANGARA, CHALA, THIRUVANANTHPURAM- 695036, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, T.S.RAMACHANDRAN. BY ADVS.SRI.P.N.DAMODARAN NAMBOODIRISRI.P.UNNIKRISHNAN (THRISSUR) RESPONDENTS: 1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),O/O THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001. 2THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,O/O THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL PROCESSING -TDS, GAZIABAD- 201 001.O/O THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL PROCESSING -TDS, GAZIABAD- 201 001. R1-2 BY SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, STANDING COUNSEL. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON09.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Dated this the 09th day of April 2021 The learned counsel for the petitioner oninstructions submits that the petitioner is notinterested in prosecuting the instant petition andhe has filed memo for withdrawal of the petition. In this view of the matter the petition isdismissed as withdrawn. SSK/09/04 Sd/-A.M.BADARJUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1TRUE COPY OF THE PENALTY ORDER FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14 DATED 26/01/2014ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THEPETITIONER.ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14 DATED 26/01/2014ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THEPETITIONER. EXT.P1ATRUE COPY OF THE PENALTY ORDER FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16 DATED 20/03/2015ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THEPETITIONER.ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16 DATED 20/03/2015ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THEPETITIONER. EXT.P2TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL AGAINST THE PENALTYORDER DATED 21/01/2017 FOR THE YEAR 2013-14FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1STRESPONDENT.ORDER DATED 21/01/2017 FOR THE YEAR 2013-14FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1STRESPONDENT. EXT.P2ATRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL AGAINST THE PENALTYORDER DATED 18/01/2017 FOR THE YEAR 2015-16FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1STRESPONDENT.ORDER DATED 18/01/2017 FOR THE YEAR 2015-16FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1STRESPONDENT. EXT.P3TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON APPELLATE ORDER ITANO.204 & 193/EF/TVM/CIT(A), TVM/2016-17DATED 09/01/2018 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS2013-14 & 2015-16 ISSUED BY THE 1STRESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.NO.204 & 193/EF/TVM/CIT(A), TVM/2016-17DATED 09/01/2018 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS2013-14 & 2015-16 ISSUED BY THE 1STRESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:NIL SSK //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan