Wp(C)/6795/2015 Of Shri. Mohammed Basheer v. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Inv.)
High Court
25 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/6795/2015 Of Shri. Mohammed Basheer v. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Inv.)
Date of order
25 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/6795/2015 Of Shri. Mohammed Basheer v. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Inv.), the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
MONDAY, THE 25 DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 6795 OF 2015
PETITIONERS:
1SHRI. MOHAMMED BASHEER,AGED 63 YEARS,AGED 63 YEARS,
RBM MANSION, MOOLAVATTAM.P.O., MOOLEDAM, KOTTAYAM-686 012.KOTTAYAM-686 012.
2SMT. REMLA BASHEER,KOTTAYAM-686 012.KOTTAYAM-686 012.
RBM MANSION, MOOLAVATTAM.P.O., MOOLEDAM,
BY ADV SRI.RAMESH CHERIAN JOHN
RESPONDENTS:
1THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INV.)ERNAKULAM, OFFICE OF THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF INCOME ERNAKULAM, OFFICE OF THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF INCOME
TAX(INV.), PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING, SASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM-686 001.KOTTAYAM-686 001.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME CENTRAL CIRCLE, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
TAX(CENTRAL), COCHIN, 5TH FLOOR, KANDAMKULATHY TOWERS,
M.G.ROAD, COCHIN-682 011.
3THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE, OFFICE OF THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF INCOME CENTRAL CIRCLE, OFFICE OF THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF INCOME
TAX (INV.), PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING, SASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM-686 001.KOTTAYAM-686 001.
BY ADVS.
SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
25.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioners submit noinstructions.
Taking into consideration of the above submission, the writpetition is closed, making it clear that if the petitioners have anysubsisting grievance, they may apply to this Court for re-openingof the writ petition.
DK
Sd/-GOPINATH P.JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.