Wp(C)/6798/2009 Of N.k. Saeed v. Agrl. Income Tax And Cto And Another
High Court
03 Mar 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/6798/2009 Of N.k. Saeed v. Agrl. Income Tax And Cto And Another
Date of order
03 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/6798/2009 Of N.k. Saeed v. Agrl. Income Tax And Cto And Another, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH
TUESDAY, THE 3RD MARCH 2009 / 12TH PHALGUNA 1930
WP(C).No. 6798 of 2009(T)
-------------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
---------------------
N.K. SAEED , N.K. CHICKEN AGENCY
CHERUKUNNU, OTHUKKUNGAL PO, MALAPPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR
RESPONDENT(S):
-----------------------
1. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX & COMMERCIAL
TAX OFFICER, KOTTAKKAL.
2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, (APPEALS)
COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI C.K. GOVINDAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 03/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
K. M. JOSEPH, J.
--------------------------------------
W.P.C. NO. 6798 OF 2009 T
--------------------------------------
Dated this the 3[rd] March, 2009
JUDGMENT
By Ext.P1, the application for registration filed by thepetitioner was rejected. Petitioner preferred Ext.P2 Appeal. Iheard the learned Government Pleader also. I feel that adecision should be taken expeditiously. The Writ Petition isdisposed of directing the second respondent to consider and takea decision on Ext.P2 in accordance with law, with opportunityof hearing to the petitioner, within one month from the date ofproduction of a copy of this Judgment.
Sd/= K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE
kbk.
// True Copy //
PS to Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.