Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/6835/2020 Of Thiruvananthapuram Se...

Wp(C)/6835/2020 Of Thiruvananthapuram Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 06 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/6835/2020 Of Thiruvananthapuram Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
06 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/6835/2020 Of Thiruvananthapuram Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL FRIDAY, THE 06TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 16TH PHALGUNA, 1941 WP(C).No.6835 OF 2020(D) PETITIONER/S: THIRUVANANTHAPURAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,GOVERNMENT PRESS ROAD, PUTHENCHANTHA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY V.S.RAMESH. BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIRSRI.SREEJITH R.NAIRSMT. ARYA ANILSHRI.GOKULRAJ L.SMT.SRI HARINI S.P. RESPONDENT/S: 1INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-2(1),TRIVANDRUM - 695 003. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),TRIVANDRUM - 695003. OTHER PRESENT: SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON06.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court, seeking a direction tothe appellate authority to dispose of the appeal and interimapplication preferred against the assessment order issued by thesecond respondent - Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). 2.Though this Court ought not to have interfered, but inthe interest of justice, without expressing any opinion, this writpetition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondentto take a decision on Ext.P3 application for stay filed along withExt.P2 appeal in accordance with law, after affording anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of onemonth from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Incase any demand is raised, petitioner is at liberty to approachthe appellate authority. Sd/ AMIT RAWAL JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 26/12/2019 FOR THE YEAR 2017-18. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE STATUTORY APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE A.Y.2017-18. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FOR THE YEAR2017-18 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan